Determining Degree of Ownership
Your LLC’s operating agreement spells out in very precise terms how much ownership each member of the business has. There is not one “right” way of dividing ownership and responsibilities, but rather a variety of ways you could choose to structure your business.
Many businesses decide to have member ownership be proportional to each member’s capital investment. For example, if Member A has invested $1000 of their personal money to start the business, and Member B has contributed $2000 of their personal funds, Member B would be designated as owning twice as many shares of the company as Member A in the operating agreement (because Member B has given twice as much money.)
However, you don’t have to allocate ownership in proportion to capital contributions. A member may choose to be a passive investor — one who does not have responsibilities for the day-to-day operation of the business — but may contribute the majority of the financial capital needed to get the business started. Another member of that same business may contribute little in financial capital, but may actively manage daily operations. In this situation, the members may consider their contributions to the overall business to be equally valuable, and therefore may choose to split the shares of the business equally.
Likewise, members may agree that while one has contributed more money to the business, the other does a larger amount of work. In this scenario, they may decide to split shares with 40% going to the former member and 60% to the later.
Such freedom to create personalized operating agreements is great benefit of forming an LLC, and is the reason LLCs are such flexible entities.
An LLC operating agreement spells out the terms of ownership, as well as how voting operates within the business. You could create an agreement where every member gets a number of votes equal to the number of shares they own. Conversely, the agreement may grant each member an equal vote, regardless of the number of shares they hold.
The terms of your operating agreement will also precisely define how many votes constitutes a majority for making major decisions regarding the business. You will want to spend time refining this portion of your agreement, because otherwise you will have to use your state’s default regulations, which vary among states.
For example, in Delaware a simple majority of 51% of the vote is enough to authorize a merger of the business with another entity. In some other states, a two-thirds majority is required approve the same merger. You will want to decide for yourself, based on your personal circumstances, what number of votes you would like to constitute a majority decision for issues such as mergers or liquidations.
When you are starting your company, it is likely that most of your time will spent putting your business together, and thinking about its bright future. No one wants to contemplate the potential for unhappy customers, or disagreeable partners. One issue that does need to be addressed at the outset of forming your business is the death or retirement of one of the members of the LLC.
Your operating agreement can provide parameters for these eventualities that will be easy for members to follow and will help guarantee the uninterrupted operation of your business. Your operating agreement can provide that remaining members are allowed the first opportunity to buy the leaving member’s shares of the business. Or your operating agreement can protect assets by removing the voting power of shares taken away from a member involuntarily.
The topic of succession planning in your LLC operating agreement is an advanced topic that you will want to spell out in depth. You may wish to speak with an attorney to further discuss the way forming an LLC allows for asset protection under these circumstance. Again, an LLC is the most flexible form of incorporation you can choose to define your business entity and specify it’s regulations.
Protecting Limited Liability of Single Member LLCs
Some people believe that if you are forming a single member LLC there is no need to create an operating agreement. After all, the operating agreement is basically designed to define terms of ownership among members for the purpose of avoiding disputes. Why would a single owner need to make an agreement with themselves? However, for the single owner, an operating agreement can help preserve your business’s limited liability status.
If you operate your single member LLC without an operating agreement, your business starts to resemble a sole proprietorship. If this happens, a judge presiding over a disagreement involving your business could decide that your LLC is not a truly separate entity from your person.
In this case, you can be held personally liable in the dispute. This is called “piercing the corporate veil” under the alter ego theory. As a single member LLC, if you take the time to create a formal operating agreement, you will be making your intention clear that you as an individual and the LLC are two separate entities.
If that happens, then a judge could pierce your corporate veil under the alter ego theory, holding that your LLC and you as an individual are actually one and the same.
Does Your Operating Agreement Have to Be In Writing?
Some people still like to conduct business on their word and a handshake. And there are several states that continue to permit members of an LLC to conduct their business with a non-written operating agreement.
States which require LLC operating agreements to be in writing:
District of Columbia
States in which no writing is required
Georgia (writing is required for single member LLCs)
Illinois (writing is required for single member LLCs)
Louisiana (writing is required for single member LLCs)
Understand from a practical standpoint that that having a verbal operating agreement and having no operating agreement can be difficult for a third party to determine…for example, a judge hearing a legal dispute between the LLCs members.
Suppose member A and member B form an LLC and agree, verbally, to an operating agreement that favors member A in a certain way. Then, member A and B have a falling out and end up in litigation.
It turns out that their state’s default rules are more generous to member B on the issue in dispute. So now member A argues to the court that it should enforce the parties verbal operating agreement, while member B will argue that the parties never had any operating agreement whatsoever and always intended to rely on the state’s default rules. It is VERY expensive in terms of legal fees to untangle a dispute of that kind.